Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 So. 2d 183 - Almon v. Byrd

336 So. 2d 183 - Almon v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2018

2 state decisions

2019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roddam v. Martin · Wooten v. Steele · Plann v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “These authorities would seem to make it clear that a judgment creditor need not have an established lien before he can bring an action to set aside a fraudulent conveyance. If the law were to the contrary, a judgment debtor could always prevent his judgment creditor from subjecting his property to payment of the debt by conveying it before the judgment creditor filed his judgment. Since having a lien is not a condition precedent to a judgment creditor’s bringing an action to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, the acquisition of a lien by filing the judgment is not a circumstance constituting fraud which needs to be stated with particularity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Defendants and the trial court assume that the appropriate method for enforcing Rule 9 (b) is a motion to dismiss under Rule 12 (b)(6). This assumption would appear to be based on the practice of using a demurrer to test the sufficiency of allegations of fraud prior to the adoption of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. *Page 89 For purposes of deciding this case, we do not question this assumption, but we refer the reader to Wright Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1300, for a discussion of the problem."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.