Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 261 - Jackson v. Pierre

Jackson v. Pierre’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2012

4 state decisions

2019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company · Laird v. Travelers Insurance Company · Rowe v. Travelers Insurance Company · Adoption v. Davis · 293 So. 2d 608 - Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Cos.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wjhile such a plea is admissible against a defendant in a civil proceeding, it is not conclusive, and the amount of weight to be given to such a plea must be determined by consideration of all the evidence, including the reason for the plea. In finding the defendants without fault, the first circuit gave weight to their explanation “[t]hat it would be less hassle and expense to pay the fine rather than go through with a trial on such a matter.” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]hat it would be less hassle and expense to pay the fine rather than go through with a trial on such a matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “both [defendants] entered guilty pleas by paying the fines prescribed therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.