Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 271 - Foreman v. Kent

Foreman v. Kent’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1981
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · Rizley v. Cutrer · 311 So. 2d 36 - Springer v. Government Employees Ins. Co., Inc. · Holder v. Travelers Insurance Co. · Wishom v. Ford Motor Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... [W]here, as here, the decision rests primarily on the determination of credibility, the trial judge is peculiarly better able than we to separate the facts from the fluff. It is a well recognized principle of appellate review that we apply."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.