Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 361 - State v. Spratling

State v. Spratling’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2018

21 state decisions

7019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 292 So. 2d 69 - Smith v. State · Spratling v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the absence of a stipulation or consent, the trial of the criminal case should not be construed as a probation revocation hearing but can be treated as such upon stipulation or consent made before or after the trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.