Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 So. 2d 364 - Baker v. State

336 So. 2d 364 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably State v. Gold (1980), 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State (1981)

35 state decisions

1901976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · United States v. Harris · Donnelly v. United States · Cappaert v. United States · People v. Spriggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Because we have concluded that admissions against interest need not be excluded as hearsay, testimony of persons who have heard a confession should be considered on motion for new trial, when the person confessing is unavailable to testify himself.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “trial judge has a wide discretion in the matter of granting or denying [motions for new trial] which we will not overthrow unless some abuse is shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.