Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 So. 2d 375 - Dowst v. State

336 So. 2d 375 - Dowst v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1994

12 state decisions

70197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 265 So. 2d 64 - Arnold v. State · 285 So. 2d 385 - Roberts v. State · 248 So. 2d 690 - State ex rel. Furlong v. Goodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the person taking the child into custody determines, pursuant to paragraph (c), that the child should be detained or placed in shelter care, he shall immediately notify the parents or legal custodians of the child and shall, without unreasonable delay, deliver the child to the appropriate intake officer ..." (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"We hold that when the Defendant, sixteen years of age, requested to speak to his parents and was denied, such request constituted a continuous assertion of his privilege against self incrimination and that any confession given by him before either (1) he is granted the right to make such call, or (2) the officer makes a good faith effort to so advise his parents, is inadmissible in evidence." 336 So.2d at 376 (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.