Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 So. 2d 378 - Hampton v. State

336 So. 2d 378 - Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2007

15 state decisions

601976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pope v. State · 57 Ala. App. 310 - Fisher v. State · 246 So. 2d 566 - State v. Roby · Ryals v. State · Fisher v. Fisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The key is whether the extra criminal act done by one's confederate is in furtherance or prosecution of the intitial common criminal design. This is a factual question which must be resolved on a case-by-case basis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where several persons combine to commit an unlawful act, each is criminally responsible for the actions of his associates committed in furtherance or prosecution of a common design.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.