Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 478 - Bohonowsky v. State

Bohonowsky v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 248 So. 2d 526 - Rumph v. State · 274 So. 2d 6 - White v. State · Garland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, in such cases it has been said that the best evidence of a person's intent to steal is what he did steal. (Citations omitted). The evidence presented by the state does not exclude the reasonable hypothesis that appellants only intended to steal goods from the store with a value of less than $100.00.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.