Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 730 - Ausmer v. Sliman

Ausmer v. Sliman’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2024

6 state decisions

30197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on KELLEY, ADMR. v. Sportsmen's Speedway · McGill v. City of Laurel · Langford v. Mercurio · Gordon v. CHC CORPORATION

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The long-established rule in this state is that water hazards are not attractive nuisances, and the attractive nuisance doctrine does not extend to swimming pools, although there may be exceptions where the hazards are hidden or concealed and are not likely to be found and avoided by a child. Gordon v. C.H.C. Corporation, 236 So.2d 733 (Miss.1970); McGill v. City of Laurel, 252 Miss. 740 , 173 So.2d 892 (1965). [[Image here]] Under established law in this state the only duty owed the child, as a trespasser, was not to willfully or wantonly injure him. Langford v. Mercurio, 254 Miss. 788 , 183 So.2d 150 (1966); Kelley v. Sportsmen’s Speedway, Inc., 224 Miss. 632 , 80 So.2d 785 (1955). We, therefore, conclude that the trial judge was correct in entering judgment for appellees, and the judgment must be and the same is affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.