Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 745 - Austin v. Montgomery

Austin v. Montgomery’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 1978
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Illinois ex rel. Kennedy v. Hurley · Ford v. Culbertson · Illinois Central Railroad v. Williams · Graves v. Johnson · DeLaughter v. Womack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he official comment to the Uniform Commercial Code establishes three definite and invariable requirements as to the memorandum necessary to take a case outside the statute of frauds. In the first place, the memorandum must evidence a contract for the sale of goods; secondly, it must be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought; and, thirdly, it must specify a quantity. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.