336 So. 2d 793 - State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1993
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 305 So. 2d 514 - State v. James · State v. Richardson · State v. Malmay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“More than one act of prostitution must be offered to prove that the prostitution is habitually practiced.” The habitual nature of the prostitution is an essential element of the crime charged. Therefore, the testimony relating to the sexual acts performed at defendant’s massage parlor on dates other than the one charged in the bill of information was admissible as part of the crime charged....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fontenot“on the thirtieth day of December in the year of our Lord, one thousand nine hundred and seventy-five[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.