Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SO2D 904 - Cazes v. Ragusa

Cazes v. Ragusa’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2005

5 state decisions

301976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 199 So. 2d 196 - Huntsberry v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since neither party can, without his neglect or consent, be deprived of his right to jury trial and since no other party to the suit is required to duplicate a request for jury trial, any withdrawal of the request for jury trial by the original party seeking and obtaining same must, necessarily, entitle the Other parties to an opportunity to make a timely request for jury trial in Their behalf.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.