Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 SW2D 440 - Pruitt v. Turner

Pruitt v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rains v. Simpson · Davis v. Burris · Heyn v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. · Bumpus v. Fisher · Mabry v. Little

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Mabry v. Little, 19 Tex. 337 , Justice Wheeler held that even if the unlearned justice of the peace had no jurisdiction, if the plaintiff submitted to his jurisdiction he waived the trespass and an action for damages would not lie. In Anderson v. Roberts, Tex.Civ.App., 35 S.W. 416 , 417, the rule is stated that even if the justice improperly determines he has jurisdiction, he cannot be held liable for his acts for ‘When the state confers judicial powers upon an individual it confers him with full immunity from private suits.’ The general rule is similarly stated in 51 C.J.S. Justices of the Peace § 19, p. 36, and 173 A.L.R. 802 . The jurisdictional test has been reiterated by such venerable authorities as Coke, Bacon, Blackstone, Kent and the ancient Dalton’s ‘Countrey Justice.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It was a settled principle at the very foundation of well-ordered jurisprudence that every judge, whether of a higher or lower court, in the exercise of the jurisdiction, conferred on him by law, had the right to decide according to his own free and unembarrassed convictions, uninfluenced by any apprehension of private prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.