Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

336 S.W.3d 212

Clark v. ROVETO

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2011

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-03-29

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2018

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Kimberly Clark appeals the modification judgment that decreased the child support and maintenance payments from her ex-husband, Arthur Roveto. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the modification judgment.

¶3 AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

/336/sw3d/212 · .json · Public domain