State v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Schmerber v. State of California · Hudson v. Michigan · Breithaupt v. Abram · Guzman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Petitioner is not one of the few who on grounds of fear, concern for health, or religious scruple might prefer some other means of testing . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for most people the procedure involves virtually no risk, trauma, or pain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in accordance with medically accepted procedures”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.