Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 U.S. 245 - International Union Uaw Af of Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

International Union Uaw Af of Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

336 U.S. 245 · 1949

Citation profile

565
cited by 565 later decisions
63
cited 63 times by the Supreme Court
36
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

158 federal appellate · 22 district · 241 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 565 later decisions (63 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2003 · most notably San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon (1959), Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul (1963)

158 federal appellate · 22 district · 241 state decisions — followed in 36 states

31301949195019601970198019902000decidedoverruled

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. A case is still cited after being overruled — to note the reversal, distinguish it, or in dissent. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Thornhill v. Alabama · Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 565 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[The] recognition of the ‘right to strike' [in the National Labor Relations Act] plainly contemplates a lawful strike, — the exercise of the unquestioned right to quit work," and it did not operate to legalize the sit-down strike, which state law made illegal and state authorities punished. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp., 306 U.S. 240 [ 59 S.Ct. 490 , 83 L.Ed. 627 ]. Nor, for example, did it make legal a strike that ran afoul of federal law, Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board, 316 U.S. 31 [ 62 S.Ct. 886 , 86 L.Ed. 1246 ]; nor one in violation of a contract made pursuant thereto, Labor Board v. Sands Mng. Co., 306 U.S. 332 [ 59 S.Ct. 508 , 83 L.Ed. 682 ]; nor one creating a national emergency, United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258 [ 67 S.Ct. 677 , 91 L.Ed. 884 ].”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(p)olicing of such conduct is left wholly to the states.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(t)his conduct is governable by the State or it is entirely ungoverned,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.