State v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Humphrey v. Cady · Jones v. United States · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State · 227 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Curiel · 34 Wis. 2d 607 - State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Raskin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we give deference to the [circuit] court's determination of credibility and evaluation of the evidence and draw on its reasoning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“what arrangements are available to ensure that the person has access to and will take necessary medication”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonably be convinced by evidence it ha[d] a right to believe and accept as true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.