State v. Ermers’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Foucha v. Louisiana · 90 Wis. 2d 97 - Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp. · 197 Wis. 2d 279 - State v. Post · State v. Rachel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the only reasonable construction of § 980.09(1) and (2) is that the 'change' that must be alleged in the petition under § 980.09(1), as we have interpreted it, must also be shown by the documents considered under § 980.09(2) in order to obtain a discharge hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hager“the person no longer meets the criteria for commitment as a sexually violent person. This appears to have been the construction adopted by this court of the old version of Wis. Stat. § 980.09 (2) (2009-10), which omitted any reference to the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hager“in the person himself or herself, but also a change in the professional knowledge and research used to evaluate a person's mental disorder or dangerousness ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hager
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.