Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 Ark. 247 - Dawson v. Temps Plus, Inc.

Dawson v. Temps Plus, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
3
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably K.C. Properties of N.W. Arkansas, Inc. v. Lowell Investment Partners, LLC (2008), Bendinger v. Marshalltown Trowell Co. (1999)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 60 state decisions

5701999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc. · Norlund v. Faust · Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. · Unigard Security Insurance v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. · 19 Ark. App. 137 - Duffner v. Alberty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish sufficient grounds for a permanent injunction, the movant must show (1) that it is threatened with irreparable harm; (2) that this harm outweighs any injury which granting the injunction will inflict on other parties; (3) a likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) that the public interest favors the injunction. Irreparable harm is the touchstone of injunctive relief. Harm is normally only considered irreparable when it cannot be adequately compensated by money damages or redressed in a court of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In general, damages recoverable for breach of contract are those damages which would place the injured party in the same position as if the contract had not been breached.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Consequential damages are those damages that do not flow directly and immediately from the breach, but only from some of the consequences or results of the breach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.