Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 Ark. 45 - Walton v. Lewis

Walton v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hovey · Morgan v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 2. Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate A written provision in any maritime transaction or a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction, or the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing to submit to arbitration an existing controversy arising out of such a contract, transaction, or refusal, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.