Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 Ark. 494 - Renshaw v. Norris

Renshaw v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Thomas v. State (2002), Hobbs v. Turner (2014)

56 state decisions

350199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Bonner · 52 Cal. 2d 250 - In Re Tartar · MacKey v. Lockhart · Bangs v. State · Lambert v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question then becomes whether there are time limits on when a petition must file a writ of habeas corpus based on an illegal sentence. Certainly, a petitioner cannot waive a court’s lack óf subject-matter jurisdiction. And neither the Arkansas Constitution nor the state statutes place a time limit on pursuing a writ of habeas corpus. Indeed, to do so would contravene the proscription against suspending the right to habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Challenges to the length of confinement are properly considered in the context of habeas corpus proceedings. Thus, the unlawful confinement of an individual under a sentence longer than that permitted by statute constitutes a denial of liberty without due process of law, and a petitioner alleging such confinement is entitled to seek habeas corpus relief under the Great Writ.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.