In Re Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 1330 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 18 U.S.C. § 151
Relies on Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.) · Superior Crewboats Inc Mv Stacey Mv Stacey v. P & I J · United States v. Kolstad · In Re Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Barry] has prepared, signed, and filed a false petition, an improper Chapter 13 plan summary and chapter 13 plan, an objection to claim and related memoranda without factual or legal basis, and a proof of claim and has advocated all of those for improper purpose and knowing that they were factually incorrect ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Cochener
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.