Libutti v. Di Brizzi’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.2d 216 · 1964
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably Simmons v. Avisco, Local 713, Textile Workers Union of America (1965), Crowley v. Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen, & Packers (1982)
24 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 481
Relies on Oyler v. Adams · Detroy v. American Guild of Variety Artists · United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. · Robins v. Rarback
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conceded facts show a serious violation of a fundamental right”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“Of course the guarantees of Sec. 101 (a) [Sec. 411(a)(1)] (1) do not provide federal courts with a mandate for general supervision of union elections. A plaintiff complaining that ballots will not be counted properly or that the efficacy of his vote is otherwise threatened by practices subsequent to the nomination and voting must look to the broader provisions of Sec. 401(e) [Sec. 481 (e)] for a federally created remedy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * only in accordance with the constitution and bylaws of the organization which has assumed trusteeship * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.