Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 F.2d 302 - Pigg v. United States

Pigg v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

337 F.2d 302 · 1964

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
5
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 1984 · most notably Klingler v. United States (1969), Spinelli v. United States (1967)

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

310196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3052 · 18 U.S.C. § 3615 · 18 U.S.C. § 659

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* A' * :|: * * “ * * * We cannot escape the conclusion that this is another case where an attempt is made to establish probable cause by the fruits of the search and seizure and by other after-acquired information, a practice long condemned. (Citations omitted). Without such post-arrest information, it clearly and unmistakably appears that the arrest stemmed from mere suspicion ; it was not based upon information which would warrant a reasonable prudent person in believing that'appellant was violating or had violated the law. As a consequence, appellant’s motion to suppress should have been granted.” ******”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “How much liquor have you got in the car?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.