Moore v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.2d 350 · 1964
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Keto v. United States · Lauer v. United States · Jackson v. United States · Taylor v. United States · United States v. Ansani
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““absent exceptional circumstances, the sufficiency of the indictment is not subject to collateral attack * * Moore v. United States, 337 F.2d 350, 352 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 994 , 85 S.Ct. 712 , 13 L.Ed.2d 614 (1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.