Zacharias v. Ippen’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.2d 445 · 1964
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 24 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Relies on Hess v. Pawloski · Olberding v. Illinois Central Railroad · Feinsinger v. Bard. Feinsinger v. Century Indemnity Co. Feinsinger v. Irving W. Rice & Co., Inc · Guerra De Chapa v. Allen · Brooks v. National Bank of Topeka
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substituted service of process to afford redress to persons injured within the state as a result of the operation of a motor vehicle therein by a non-resident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.