¶1M. H. Rosenhouse, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
¶2Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., J. Edward Shillingburg, Dept, of Justice, Washington^ D. C., for appellee.
¶3Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, andi JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
¶5The facts from which this controversy arose, and the principles applied by the-district court in reaching its conclusion, are set forth in its opinion. United States v. Harris, 223 F.Supp. 309. We-agree with the conclusion and are in accord with the principles announced in the-opinion. The judgment of the district, court is
¶6Affirmed.