Lampkins v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.3d 1009 · 2003
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Illinois v. Allen · Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc · Holbrook v. Flynn · Cottrell v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bottomed on the claim that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, that the damages are excessive, or that, for other reasons, the trial was not fair to the party moving; and may raise questions of law arising out of alleged substantial errors in admission or rejection of evidence or instructions to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.