Parsad v. Greiner’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.3d 175 · 2003
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Newton (2004), Harris v. Kuhlmann (2003)
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unreasonable and not entitled to deference pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2), because the majority failed to consider whether petitioner was placed in custody by virtue of the detectives' seizure of his [blood-stained] pants”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Green v. Travis“[T]he phrase `clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States' ... refers to the holdings ... of this Court's decisions as of the time of the relevant state-court decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[T]he mere fact that a police officer takes a statement after a suspect invokes his right to remain silent does not, standing alone, render that statement the product of coercion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.