Holcomb v. Lykens’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.3d 217 · 2003
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Walczyk v. Rio (2007), Shakur v. Selsky (2004)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Sandin v. Conner · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Duncan v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assert[ed] that he was deprived of his Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights when Vermont state corrections officers revoked his extended furlough without following the procedures”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shakur v. Selsky“[S]tate statutes do not create federally protected due process entitlements to specific state-mandated procedures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shakur v. Selsky“may affirm on any grounds for which there is a record sufficient to permit conclusions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.