Hamdi v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
337 F.3d 335 · 2003
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Fay v. Noia · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Poe v. Ullman · Hirabayashi v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“those circumstances are neither conceded in fact, nor susceptible to concession in law, because Hamdi has not been permitted to speak for himself or even through counsel as to those circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld“What are the allowable limits of military discretion, and whether or not they have been overstepped in a particular case, are judicial questions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld“[t]o compare [Hamdi's] battlefield capture to the domestic arrest in Padilla v. Rumsfeld is to compare apples and oranges,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Al-Marri v. Wright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.