Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 F.3d 404 - United States v. Blount

United States v. Blount’s Empirical Analysis

337 F.3d 404 · 2003

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably United States v. Jenkins (2009), United States v. Perez (2010)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

360200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Smith v. United States · Texas v. Cobb · United States v. Nale · United States v. Condren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense; or possessed or transferred any firearm or ammunition with knowledge, intent, or reason to believe that it would be used or possessed in connection with another felony offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.” 284 U.S. at 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180 . 8 . The court acknowledged that the definition, of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the defendant actually used the stolen weapon to intimidate occupants of the home, or that he prepared for this contingency by keeping the firearm close at hand”), with U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 cmt. n. 14(A) (requiring only a finding that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.