Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 F.3d 758 - Harris v. Carter

Harris v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

337 F.3d 758 · 2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · Price, Warden v. Vincent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant or defense counsel makes a timely objection to joint representation based on an asserted conflict of interests.” Harris, 337 F.3d at 761 (emphasis added); Moss, 323 F.3d at 455 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.