In re Effexor Antitrust Litig.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 2072
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Hanna v. Plumer · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts have consistently held that the Rhode Island repealer applies prospectively”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Rhode Island's repealer does not apply retroactively”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.