Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 29 U.S.C. § 215
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Bonin v. Calderon · Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc. · Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the counterclaims are baseless, brought in bad faith, brought with a retaliatory motive and lack a reasonable basis in law and fact, or are designed to deter claimants from seeking legal redress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.