Martinez v. the State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Suggs v. State · Arnold v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must prove a reasonable probability that, but for [his] counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. This burden, though not impossible to carry, is a heavy one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LANHAM v. the STATE.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.