Oliver v. the State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Scott v. State · Phillips v. State · Jefferson v. Zant · 230 Ga. App. 224 - Culver v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“trial counsel's performance fell below a reasonable standard of conduct and that there existed a reasonable probability that the outcome of the case would have been different had it not been for counsel's deficient performance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. the State.“How to conduct cross-examination is a tactical decision within the exclusive province of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. the State.“[t]actical decisions, even if they misfire, do not generally equate with ineffectiveness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. the State.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.