337 Ill. App. 3d 977 - People v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 379 Ill. App. 3d 441 - People v. Spicer (2008), 366 Ill. App. 3d 1080 - People v. Monroe (2006)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 102 Ill. 2d 181 - People v. Krankel · Olden v. Kentucky · 185 Ill. 2d 532 - People v. Smith · 196 Ill. 2d 236 - People v. Ortiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ [Statements made by the victim to medical personnel for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment including descriptions of the cause of symptom, pain or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment shall be admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule.” 725 ILCS 5/115 — 13 (West 2002).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the part of C.G.'s statement referring to her ex-boyfriend as the perpetrator was not admissible under this exception since the identity of the person who attacked her was not necessary to her receiving proper medical treatment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Drake“identification of the offender is outside the scope of the exception”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Drake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.