Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 MD 304 - Sahin v. State

Sahin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2020

7 state decisions

401995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yagow v. United States · Trammel v. United States · United States v. Bowie · 133 Ill. 2d 540 - Patzner v. Baise · United States v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) Opinion and reputation evidence of character. The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but subject to these limitations: (1) the evidence may refer only to character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, and (2) evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the character of the witness for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation evidence or otherwise.” (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““when a defendant charged with a crime which would be an impeachable offense elects to testify, the State’s evidence that the defendant committed the impeachable offense constitutes an attack sufficient to allow the defendant to present character evidence of his or her good character for truthfulness.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “‘crimes in the nature of perjury or subornation of perjury, false statement, criminal fraud, embezzlement, false pretense, or any other offense involving some element of deceitfulness, untruthfulness, or falsification bearing on [a] witnesses] propensity to testify truthfully.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.