State v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2020
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Broce · Medina v. California · Roy v. Gravel · 71 Cal. 2d 84 - People v. Berutko · Treece v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under this intricate scheme, when Marsh waived his right to a jury trial as to guilt or innocence, he was precluded thereby from seeking a jury determination as to criminal responsibility---- Thus under this Rule,[ 16 ] the election of a bench trial on the merits inevitably encompasses a waiver of jury rights as to criminal responsibility. “In this respect, the question of criminal responsibility is like every other issue to be decided in the cases. See People v. Berutko, 71 Cal.2d 84 , 453 P.2d 721, 727 , 77 Cal.Rptr. 217, 223 (1969) (jury waiver goes to all of the issues to be decided in the case).” Marsh, 337 Md. at 539 , 654 A.2d at 1323 . [Footnote added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Galloway v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.