Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 N.C. 132 - State v. Brooks

State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 165 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc. (2004), State v. Biber (2011)

2 federal appellate · 165 state decisions

760199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · Ashe v. Swenson · Montana v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'so long as a reasonable person would understand that he or she could refuse to cooperate.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The rule of Miranda requiring that suspects be informed of their constitutional rights before being questioned by the police only applies to custodial interrogation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he test for determining whether a seizure has occurred is whether under the totality of the circumstances a reasonable person would feel that he was not free to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.