State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably State v. Blair (1984), State v. McKettrick (1992)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Woods v. United States · Hinkle v. State · State v. Williams · State v. Schoelerman · Sims v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All grounds for relief available to an applicant under this chapter must be raised in his original, supplemental or amended application. Any ground finally adjudicated or not raised, or knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence, or in any other proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief, may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cuevas v. State“The showing made here by defendant is inadequate to support a holding that the issue of ineffective assistance should be reserved for determination in postcon-viction proceedings. See Iowa R.App.P. 14(a)(4) (statement of the case in a brief “shall ... recite the facts relevant to the issues presented for review”).... [W]e hold no claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has been presented to this court. The postconviction court will decide if defendant has carried his burden to show a sufficient reason for not pursuing the issue on this appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Blair
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.