Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

337 Or. App. 85

State v. Kitch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2024

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2024-12-26

Applies OR 138 § 138.105 · OR 2 § 2.570

Affirmed · Decided 2024-12-26

No. 931             December 26, 2024                   85

   This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
    pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
         except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1)

          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
                  STATE OF OREGON

                 STATE OF OREGON,
                  Plaintiff-Respondent,
                            v.
              CLIFFTON DARREL KITCH,
                  Defendant-Appellant.
              Marion County Circuit Court
                  16CR24172; A181889

  Matthew L. Tracey, Judge.
  Submitted November 8, 2024.
  Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and David O. Ferry, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon
Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
  Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
  Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
  LAGESEN, C. J.
  Affirmed.
86                                                           State v. Kitch

           LAGESEN, C. J.
         Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation and imposing a sentence of 39 months in prison. His
appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90
and State v. Balfour, 
311 Or 434
, 
814 P2d 1069
 (1991). The
brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We
affirm.1
         In 2017, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of
second-degree sexual abuse (Counts 1 and 2); one count of
luring a minor (Count 4); and one count of delivery of marijuana to a person under 18 (Count 5). As part of the plea
agreement, defendant was sentenced to consecutive terms
of 18 months in prison on Counts 1 and 4, and 60 months
of probation on Counts 2 and 5. He agreed that if his probation was revoked, then he could be sentenced to a total of 44
months in prison on Counts 2 and 5. In June 2023, the trial
court found that defendant was in violation of his probation.
The trial court revoked probation and sentenced defendant
to a total of 39 months in prison.
         Having reviewed the record, including the trial
court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour
brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed
authority to review, see ORS 138.105, we have identified no
arguably meritorious issues.
           Affirmed.




   1
     As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 
310 Or App 563
, 
484 P3d 1098
 (2021) (deciding
matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.
Nooth, 
254 Or App 402
, 
295 P3d 115
 (2012), rev den, 
353 Or 747
 (2013) (same).

/337/orapp/85 · .json · Public domain