Lobert v. Pack’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1977
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bushnell v. Bushnell · Simrell Et Ux. v. Eschenbach · Harrington v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co. · 19 Tenn. App. 615 - Richards v. Parks · Frank v. Markley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““He must have done that which he ought not to have done, or omitted that which he ought to have done, as a conscious being endowed with a will.... Nowhere in cases dealing with the subject of torts do we find the suggestion that a person should be held responsible for injuries inflicted during periods of unconsciousness.” Lobert v. Pack, 337 Pa. 103, 107 , 9 A. 2d 365, 367 (1939). (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.