Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 Pa. 529 - Novic v. Fenics

Novic v. Fenics’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2016

17 state decisions

7019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosenblum v. Rosenblum · Ballantine v. Cummings · Com. v. Benz., Com. v. Routley · Canole v. Allen · Commonwealth v. Bardoplh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When [a] plaintiff [...] relies on subsequent acts to establish the conspiracy, these acts must be such as to clearly indicate the prior collusive combination [...], not slight circumstances of suspicion, and these subsequent acts must be such as to warrant the belief and justify the conclusion that the subsequent acts were done in furtherance of the unlawful combination [...].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.