Odom v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Matthews v. Evatt · Aice v. State · Austin v. State · Hope v. State · Whitehead v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All applicants are entitled to a full and fair opportunity to present claims in one PCR application.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Successive PCR applications and appeals are generally disfavored because they allow an applicant to receive more than 'one bite at the apple as it were.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robertson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.