Southerland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Evitts v. Lucey · Simmons v. South Carolina · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant is constitutionally entitled to the effective assistance of appellate counsel.... First, the burden of proof is on petitioner to show that counsel’s performance was deficient as measured by the standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms. Second, the petitioner must prove that he or she was prejudiced by such deficiency to the extent of there being a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ezell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.