Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 So. 2d 1177 - State v. Marks

337 So. 2d 1177 - State v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

140
cited by 140 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 137 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably State v. Duncan (1982), 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew (1978)

3 federal appellate · 137 state decisions

60019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Spinelli v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"... It is the circumstances indicating an intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of an accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer's statement: `You are under arrest,' that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made. State v. Warren, 283 So.2d 740 (La.1973)...."”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The test of the competency of an expert is his knowledge of the subject about which he is called upon to express an opinion, and before any witness can give evidence as an expert his competency so to testify must have been established to the satisfaction of the court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.