337 So. 2d 1342 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

cited by 15 later decisions

states following

July 1994

most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1994

15 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Matlock · Bumper v. North Carolina · Harrington v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“or emergency situation; (5) where exigent circumstances exist coincidental with probable cause; and (6) in”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 461 So. 2d 899 - Ballard v. State · 473 So. 2d 652 - Johnson v. State
“common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effect sought to be inspected.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 461 So. 2d 899 - Ballard v. State · 355 So. 2d 1153 - Murphy v. State
“". . . In the area of `consent searches,' it has explicitly been recognized that certain third parties may validly consent to the inspection of premises or effects of an absent nonconsenting defendant if such third part[y] share with the defendant `common authority over or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effect sought to be inspected.' United States v. Matlock , 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct. 988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 . See also Myers v. State , 55 Ala. App. 404 , 316 So.2d 235 (1975), and authorities cited therein; Hawkins v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 333 So.2d 846 (1976)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 387 So. 2d 886 - Bartlett v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.