Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 337 So. 2d 40 - Cole v. State

337 So. 2d 40 - Cole v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2010

11 state decisions

7019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Embrey v. State · 48 Ala. App. 726 - Eady v. State · Boulden v. State · 54 Ala. App. 254 - Hurst v. State · Byrd v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . . It is settled law that evidence of prior difficulties as part of the chain of events leading up to the killing is admissible when offered by the State but when offered by the defendant, such evidence is admissible only if the defendant was not the aggressor in the difficulty resulting in the killing and if the defendant has offered some evidence tending to show self-defense. Foreman v. State, 50 Ala.App. 236 , 278 So.2d 238 ; Byrd v. State, 257 Ala. 100 , 57 So.2d 388 ; Sanders v. State, 242 Ala. 532 , 7 So.2d 483 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “". . . Comes now the defendant in the above styled cause and moves to suppress as evidence to be used in the trial in the above styled cause on January 23, 1978, all items seized under the authority of certain searches of the defendant's vehicle and home, said searches having occurred on August 16, 1977, a copy of said search warrants and returns being attached hereto and marked Exhibit `A' and `B' respectively, and as grounds therefor the defendant says as follows:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.